Navy ought to be held in contempt for violating courtroom order on COVID vaccine exemptions: criticism

0
40

NEWNow you can take heed to Every day Publish articles!

The U.S. Navy is violating a courtroom order by allegedly blocking therapy for a traumatic mind damage and inflicting different types of punishment on SEALs who requested spiritual exemptions to the coronavirus vaccine, in line with a brand new authorized criticism.

On Jan. 3, a federal courtroom in Texas granted a short lived injunction towards the Navy’s vaccine mandate after a number of SEALs sued President Biden. Choose Reed O’Connor, in issuing the order, argued that “[t]here is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment” and “[t]here is no military exclusion from our Constitution.”

First Liberty, a religious liberty law firm, alleges that multiple SEALs continue to encounter a variety roadblocks due to their unvaccinated status.

First Liberty, a non secular liberty legislation agency, alleges that a number of SEALs proceed to come across a range roadblocks on account of their unvaccinated standing.
(iStock)

However First Liberty, a non secular liberty legislation agency, alleges in Monday’s submitting that a number of SEALs proceed to come across a range roadblocks on account of their unvaccinated standing. 

A type of included a service member, recognized as “Navy SEAL 26,” who requested permission to journey to a program for traumatic mind accidents. In keeping with the criticism, “multiple high-ranking Naval officers in SEAL 26’s command began calling the treatment center and asking if it would deny treatment to someone who is unvaccinated.”

SEE ALSO:
Schumer, Durbin, and Whitehouse voted towards overwhelming majority of Trump minority appeals courtroom nominees

JUDGE ISSUES STAY AGAINST VACCINE MANDATE FOR NAVY SEALS SEEKING RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION

It added that the therapy middle would not comply however “the result is that the Navy ran out the clock on SEAL 26’s request again: the treatment center had to give his spot to another patient because SEAL 26 had not been given approval to attend.”

Attorneys argued that holding the Navy in contempt was “the only way to prevent continued irreparable injury” to the SEALs.

In an announcement offered to Every day Publish Digital, First Liberty common counsel Mike Berry denounced the Navy’s actions as spiritual discrimination. 

“It is reprehensible that the Navy would deny health care to a Navy SEAL suffering the effects of traumatic brain injury.  Despite the Court’s clear order prohibiting this kind of vindictive abuse, the Navy continues to punish and harass these warriors,” mentioned Berry. “The Navy continues to deny our clients training and deployment opportunities and is assigning these soldiers menial tasks instead of allowing them to defend our country. This religious discrimination must stop.”

LAWSUIT FILED ON BEHALF OF NAVY SEALs FACING INTIMIDATION FOR SEEKING RELIGIOUS COVID-19 VACCINE EXEMPTIONS

The Navy declined remark, citing ongoing litigation.

Monday’s criticism adopted brewing controversy over vaccine mandates throughout the army and the nation as an entire. In December, information surfaced {that a} top-ranking Navy officer was relieved of his obligation over a refusal to get examined for the coronavirus.

Cypriot Navy special forces and U.S. Navy SEALs take part in a joint rescue exercise in the southern Cypriot port city of Limassol on Sept. 10, 2021.

Cypriot Navy particular forces and U.S. Navy SEALs participate in a joint rescue train within the southern Cypriot port metropolis of Limassol on Sept. 10, 2021.
(Iakovos Hatzistavrou/AFP)

Every day Publish Digital beforehand reported on the Coast Guard requesting chaplains ask how often service members in search of an exemption attend spiritual companies and the way constantly they “keep the tenets of their faith.” 

SEE ALSO:
Texas decide halts a part of new election legislation forward of early voting

If members cited using fetal stem cells, the draft steerage steered asking whether or not “they have ever taken Tylenol, Pepto Bismol, Aspirin, Ibuprofen,[ ]Benadryl, or Claritin, all of which were developed using fetal cells.”

COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE: MILITARY BEGINS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS AGAINST REFUSERS

The Army Spiritual Freedom Basis, which helps the army’s mandate, advised Every day Publish Digital that the coronavirus vaccine should not be handled in another way than others that members of the army must obtain.

“Members of the military are required to get numerous other vaccines and the COVID vaccine should be absolutely no different,” MRFF President Michael Weinstein advised Every day Publish Digital through e-mail. Weinstein clarified that MRFF didn’t help a mere administrative discharge for individuals who refuse the vaccine. As an alternative, he mentioned MRFF supported court-martial and receiving lower than an honorable discharge.

A group of Navy SEAL trainees in August 2010 during Hell Week at a beach in Coronado, California.

A gaggle of Navy SEAL trainees in August 2010 throughout Hell Week at a seashore in Coronado, California.
(Charles Ommanney/Getty Photographs)

“MRFF has been contacted by over 700 American service members claiming a ‘religious objection’ to the COVID vaccine and requesting MRFF’s intervention and representation,” he mentioned. “We DO consider we every request on a case-by-case basis. We have yet to find one that is even remotely meritorious.”

SEE ALSO:
Russia scraps remaining COVID restrictions

“The very first thing we ask them is if they objected to the other often numerous vaccines they were required by their chains of command to get. If their answer is ‘no’, we’re not buying that their sudden ‘religious objection’ to this COVID vaccine has anything to do with a ‘sincerely held religious belief’ and will most assuredly NOT take them on as a client. Unless the 35 Navy SEALS involved in this lawsuit can show a track record of seeking ‘religious exemptions’ for ALL of the other many vaccines they were required to have, their requests for a religious accommodation for this one are ridiculously specious and should be flatly denied.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here