NEWNow you can hearken to Day by day Put up articles!
The Harvard College scholar newspaper editorial board revealed an editorial final week stating that it helps the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction motion, in addition to a “Free Palestine.”
Editors for the Harvard Crimson wrote within the editorial that “Palestinians, in our board’s view, deserve dignity and freedom,” stating that “We support the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction movement as a means to achieving that goal.”
The editorial states that the present coverage in Israel pushes Palestinians towards “indefinite statelessness.”
“Israel’s current policy pushes Palestinians towards indefinite statelessness, combining ethnonationalist legislation and a continued assault on the sovereignty of the West Bank through illegal settlements that difficults the prospect of a two-state solution; it merits an assertive and unflinching international response,” the editorial board wrote.
The board claims the arguments towards the BDS motion “could have been and indeed were once made against South Africa.”
PRO-ISRAEL GROUP URGES UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO TO CONDEMN GROUP CALLING FOR BOYCOTT OF ‘SH–TY ZIONIST CLASSES’
Responding to inevitable claims that the editorial can be perceived as antisemitic, the board wrote that “support for Palestinian liberation is not antisemitic.”
“We unambiguously oppose and condemn antisemitism in every and all forms, including those times when it shows up on the fringes of otherwise worthwhile movements. Jewish people — like every people, including Palestinians — deserve nothing but life, peace, and security,” the editorial states.
The board concludes by stating it’s “proud to finally to finally [sic] lend our support to both Palestinian liberation and BDS.”
“We do not take this decision lightly. BDS remains a blunt approach, one with the potential to backfire or prompt collateral damage in the form of economic hurt. But the weight of this moment — of Israel’s human rights and international law violations and of Palestine’s cry for freedom — demands this step. As a board, we are proud to finally to finally [sic] lend our support to both Palestinian liberation and BDS — and we call on everyone to do the same,” the editorial board wrote.
State Division spokesperson Ned Worth mentioned throughout a July 2021 press convention that the Biden administration “rejects” the Boycott Divestment Sanctions motion.
“We firmly reject the BDS movement, which unfairly singles out Israel,” Worth mentioned. “While the Biden-Harris administration will fully and always respect the First Amendment rights of our citizens, of the American people, the United States will be a strong partner in fighting efforts around the world that potentially seek to delegitimize Israel and will work tirelessly, to support Israel’s further integration into the international community.”
Worth’s feedback got here after Ben & Jerry’s introduced the corporate would not promote ice cream in “Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
Roz Rothstein, co-founder and CEO StandWithUs, an schooling group that fights antisemitism and helps Israel, instructed Day by day Put up Digital that the scholar newspaper editorial board “displayed ignorance at best and journalistic malpractice at worst.”
“The Crimson did no justice to Israelis or Palestinians, and undermined its own credibility as a newspaper more than anything. By omitting all context regarding terrorism against Israel, from knife attacks to launching thousands of rockets, and Palestinian leaders rejecting every major peace proposal since 1937, the editorial board displayed ignorance at best and journalistic malpractice at worst. Its lack of concern for Israeli lives and promotion of a campaign to end Israel’s existence will certainly do harm to many Jewish students on campus,” Rothstein mentioned.
Day by day Put up has reached out to the Harvard Crimson.
Day by day Put up’ Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.